Hourly
Use when the buyer controls pace or material uncertainty makes a complete scope dishonest. State what counts as time and how overruns are approved.
Answer first
How should I price a service?
Start with delivery cost and realistic capacity. Then adjust for buyer alternatives and scope: access, urgency, uncertainty, and consequence. Choose hourly, fixed, tiered, retainer, or value-based pricing only after those inputs are visible, and state the assumptions and change boundary in the quote.
This page teaches owners how to price the service their business sells. Stan's current ways to work and public fees are separate and listed on Work With Stan.
Written by Stan Tscherenkow. Published August 22, 2026; updated August 24, 2026. Sources and limits.
Calculation first
Calculate a target capacity rate
Start with the revenue the business must earn from its genuinely sellable delivery capacity. Do not divide by every paid hour in a year. Sales, administration, training, leave, and unused capacity reduce the hours that can actually carry client work. University of Maine and Penn State Extension provide the service-cost and unit-rate basis used here.
- Required annual revenue: add delivery pay or owner compensation for delivery, fixed overhead, and the profit amount the business is intentionally targeting. Do not count the same owner's delivery labor twice.
- Realistic billable hours: estimate the hours the business can sell and deliver after non-billable work and capacity loss.
- Target capacity rate: required annual revenue ÷ realistic billable hours.
- Internal quote starting point: (target capacity rate × estimated delivery hours) + direct outside costs for that assignment. Add a quote-level outside cost only when it is not already included in the annual revenue pool.
- Commercial test: compare that floor with buyer alternatives, the value and consequence of the outcome, scope, access, urgency, uncertainty, and the delivery risk the business carries.
Target capacity rate = required annual revenue ÷ realistic billable hours
Worked example, not a market benchmark: If the business needs $240,000 in annual revenue from 1,200 realistic billable hours, its target capacity rate is $200 per hour. A defined assignment estimated at 30 hours with $1,500 in direct outside costs has a $7,500 internal starting point before any separately evidenced change, uncertainty, or outcome-value adjustment. This example assumes no percentage selling fee. If one applies, include it in the calculation rather than absorbing it invisibly. The 1,200-hour input is an owner assumption, not a utilization standard. If comparable buyer alternatives cannot support the result, the answer is not automatically a discount. Rework the scope, delivery model, capacity, buyer, or economics.
This is an internal decision tool, not a rule that the customer must be billed hourly. A fixed fee, tier, retainer, or value-based price can still be the clearer commercial structure.
Learn from the delivered job: realized effective rate = cash collected ÷ all included delivery, support, and rework hours. It shows whether the assumed capacity survived delivery. It is not net profit and does not replace full cost and cash analysis.
Choose the pricing structure after the economics
Fixed
Use when the deliverable, acceptance condition, assumptions, and change boundary are stable enough to price the whole assignment.
Retainer
Use when the buyer is purchasing recurring capacity, continuity, or access. Define the included capacity and what happens when it is unused or exceeded.
Tiered
Use when buyers need meaningfully different levels of scope, access, timing, or responsibility. Every tier must be real and buyable.
Value-based
Use when the outcome and consequence can be defined with the buyer. Keep the delivery floor visible so a persuasive outcome story does not erase capacity.
Hybrid
Use a fixed or recurring base with explicitly priced variable work when both reserved capacity and changing demand are real.
These structures change how the buyer purchases the work; they do not remove the need to test delivery cost, capacity, alternatives, and scope. The structure selection is the ST decision synthesis built from the service-pricing pattern and source boundary below.
Should price change when scope, access, urgency, or risk changes?
Yes, when the buyer receives more work, more access, a faster commitment, or when the business carries materially more uncertainty or consequence. Define the deliverable, access, timing, assumptions, and change boundary before changing the number.
Use this now: Use a scope-price card that separates deliverable, access, urgency, assumptions, risk, and change control.
Hours can help estimate delivery cost, but the commercial decision is larger. Two assignments with similar work hours can carry different access, interruption, timing, uncertainty, responsibility, and consequence.
Owner worksheet
Scope-to-price change card
| Check | Write down |
|---|---|
| Deliverable delta | Compare the proposed deliverable with the priced baseline; record added outputs, quantity, revision burden, dependencies, and the delivery cost or capacity each change consumes. |
| Access and support | State the response channel, access level, meeting load, availability window, and named service boundary the buyer receives beyond the baseline. |
| Urgency displacement | Record the requested date, work that must move, premium labor or vendor cost, and opportunity cost created by reserving faster capacity. |
| Uncertainty and consequence | Name unresolved inputs, rework exposure, operational consequence, or specialist risk the business would carry, and the assumption that contains each one. |
| Commercial change | Translate only the evidenced scope, access, urgency, and risk deltas into a price, deposit, term, or exclusion change and record buyer approval. |
Close the decision: Change the price or terms only for a named commercial delta; if the delta cannot be shown, keep the baseline or narrow the work.
01Scope and access02Urgency and displacement03Uncertainty and consequence
Use a scope-price card before changing the number
Deliverable
Name what will exist, what condition finishes it, and what is excluded.
Access
State meetings, response windows, channels, availability, and who can request work.
Urgency
Price the capacity displaced by a faster start or finish, not the buyer's emotion.
Assumptions
Record buyer inputs, approvals, data quality, dependencies, and conditions the price relies on.
Risk
Name uncertainty, rework exposure, consequence, and responsibility the business must carry.
Change control
Define what triggers a new decision, a change order, a revised schedule, or a new quote.
| What changed | Do not do this | Reprice or re-scope this |
|---|---|---|
| More deliverables | Absorb a larger outcome under the old label. | Output, acceptance condition, dependencies, and delivery load. |
| More access | Treat unlimited interruption as free. | Response window, meeting load, channels, and request authority. |
| Faster commitment | Call urgency a surcharge without naming the displaced capacity. | Start date, finish date, displaced work, and recovery cost. |
| More uncertainty or consequence | Hide unknowns in a confident fixed number. | Assumptions, discovery boundary, contingency, stop rule, and specialist need. |
Pricing psychology changes how the service is compared
The buyer does not see your internal capacity rate. The buyer sees a set of choices, a total price, an outcome, and a level of uncertainty. Presentation matters, but it should make the decision clearer rather than manipulate the buyer.
Anchor to a real alternative
Frame the price against a genuine buyer alternative: internal labor, delay, another provider, a narrower scope, or doing nothing. Do not invent a higher reference price to make the quote look smaller. Pricing boundary.
Make tiers materially different
Good, better, and best works only when scope, access, timing, or outcome truly differs. Research shows that adding an option can change choice between existing options, which is a reason to make every tier honest and buyable. Research basis.
Use clean numbers deliberately
Round and just-below prices can produce different reactions, but published results are context-dependent and later replication work found weaker effects. For a serious service quote, clarity and confidence may matter more than a cosmetic price ending. Research record.
Do not let psychology hide the commercial truth. Show the total price and payment structure clearly. Do not use fake scarcity, an invented deadline, a deliberately useless decoy, hidden mandatory fees, or a fictitious former price.
Quote validity
When should a quote expire because cost, capacity, or scope assumptions can change?
A quote should expire when its price, capacity, scope, or schedule assumptions may no longer be reliable. The date is a revalidation point, not an invented pressure tactic, and there is no universal number of days that fits every business or contract.
Use this now: Use a quote revalidation card that names which cost, capacity, scope, and schedule assumptions must be checked before reissue.
The validity-date treatment is supported by the quote-expiry pattern and the commercial-document pattern below; the revalidation card is the ST synthesis.
Owner worksheet
Quote-assumption revalidation record
| Check | Write down |
|---|---|
| Cost assumptions | List material, labor, freight, currency, subcontractor, and tax inputs used in the quote, with source date and the movement that requires recalculation. |
| Capacity assumptions | Record the delivery slot, people or equipment reserved, how long the slot is held, and the availability event that invalidates the promise. |
| Scope and terms | Write the quantities, buyer inputs, dependencies, payment terms, and exclusions the quoted price assumes; identify which changes require a new quote. |
| Validity date | Set the date, time zone, and acceptance action for this quote from the earliest material assumption likely to drift, not from a universal validity period. |
| Expiry action | State whether an expired quote is rechecked, repriced, reissued, or withdrawn, who performs that review, and what the buyer must reconfirm. |
Close the decision: Honor the quote only while its named assumptions remain valid; after the trigger or validity date, revalidate before accepting the order.
Worked example
Illustrative quote expiry derived from the earliest assumption drift
Illustrative only: Illustrative commercial process only. Actual quote enforceability, acceptance, withdrawal, consumer rules, tax, contract terms, and jurisdiction require the business's documents and qualified counsel where material.
| Step | Illustrative input | Replace with your evidence | Completed test or status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quote issue and cost evidence | Illustrative quote issued September 1 for 1,000 units; supplier material price is documented only through September 15. | Actual issue timestamp, quantity, supplier quote, currency, tax/freight assumptions, and source dates. | The supplier date is evidence for one input, not the quote-expiry answer by itself. |
| Capacity assumption | One production slot is held through September 12 at 5:00 p.m. ET; after that, the delivery week must be rechecked. | Actual capacity calendar, reservation owner, time zone, and release event. | The promised schedule cannot outlive unconfirmed capacity. |
| Scope and buyer-input assumption | Final artwork and quantity confirmation are due September 10; a later change can alter setup time, cost, and delivery. | Actual buyer inputs, dependencies, exclusions, change rule, and acceptance action. | The buyer-input date is the earliest material assumption in this illustration. |
| Derived validity date | Set this illustrative quote to expire September 10 at 5:00 p.m. ET because that is the earliest dated assumption that can invalidate price or schedule. | Earliest real material drift date and documented derivation. | This is not a recommended 7-, 14-, 30-, or 90-day period. |
| Expired-quote action | After expiry, commercial operations rechecks artwork, supplier cost, capacity, tax/freight, and schedule before reissuing, repricing, or withdrawing. | Named reviewer, revalidation checklist, buyer notice, and new approval receipt. | Decision: use the evidence-derived date and revalidate; do not silently honor or pressure-renew. |
Decision produced: For this illustration, expire the quote on September 10 because the buyer-input assumption drifts first; revalidate every material input after that time instead of copying a universal period.
01Assumptions at issue02Validity date03Recheck or reissue
Quote revalidation card
When the validity date passes, do not automatically honor or reject the old quote. Recheck the assumptions that made the number and schedule honest.
- Version: quote number, issue date, validity date, and the buyer's latest scope.
- Cost: labor, supplier, subcontractor, travel, platform, tax, or other relevant inputs.
- Capacity: start date, delivery window, named people, and work displaced since issue.
- Scope: deliverables, access, buyer inputs, assumptions, exclusions, and acceptance.
- Schedule: dependencies, approval dates, lead time, and what the validity date does not reserve.
- Reissue decision: unchanged, revised, withdrawn, or converted into a different commercial document.
Bring the real scope, not only the number.
When price, delivery, risk, and the next business move are tangled together, describe the live decision.
Work with me