Stan.
The Catch · 03
03 Compounding Gaps
One assumption at filing time. Five years of compounding. Five jurisdictions of it.

One wrong assumption. Five jurisdictions of compounding.

Scroll
The assumption at filing time that the US LLC would hold the IP was made in one meeting.
1
Year two: the German subsidiary is paying IP licenses to the US LLC. Transfer pricing rules now apply. Nobody told the German tax authority that structure yet.
2
Year three: UK expansion adds a Ltd. The IP flow now needs a multi-country transfer pricing study. Your US attorney has not done one of those.
3
Year four: a potential acquirer looks at the structure and sees four siloed entities with untested IP migration paths. They discount the offer by 18%.

The assumption at filing time was correct.
The context around it was not yet built.

This is the pattern, not the exception. Most cross-border founders discover the structural gap when money tries to move across it.
· The price of one uncoordinated decision ·

The cross-border premium for structural coordination is $50K in year one.
The cross-border tax for not doing it is $500K+ in year five.

3 down. 4 to go.

Halfway. The compounding is now specific.

Continue