Symptom.
What happened? Quotes reach customers after the promised date. Record the delay before deciding why it happened.
Part of What Is Wrong With My Business?
Root cause analysis traces a recurring business problem to the conditions producing it. Describe the failure, compare plausible explanations against operating records, and test whether changing a suspected cause changes the result. Several causes can contribute; a recurring symptom alone does not identify any of them.
Stan helps business owners make clearer choices around management, growth, money, team, and operations.
Separate the terms
What happened? Quotes reach customers after the promised date. Record the delay before deciding why it happened.
Why did it happen? Incomplete job details may prevent pricing. That explanation needs evidence from the delayed quotes.
What limits output now? One person's approval capacity may limit completed quotes even after the job details are complete.
Better intake addresses missing information. Approval authority addresses waiting. A business can need both; calling them the same problem hides that choice.
Illustrative example
Suppose completed prices wait for owner approval while the information-gathering stage stays short. Better intake would leave that approval delay untouched. This is an illustration of the reasoning, not a client result.
Compare explanations
Support: work repeatedly waits for specifications. Weaker explanation: complete requests are just as late, with most delay after pricing is finished.
Support: completed quotes accumulate awaiting permission. Weaker explanation: approval is prompt but pricing itself starts late.
Support: ready-to-start work accumulates while the people doing it are occupied. Check the work mix and rework before concluding that another hire is needed.
Some quotes may lack specifications while others wait for approval. Separate those groups; an average delay can conceal two different problems.
Run a bounded test
Method and limits
A small operational test narrows uncertainty; it does not prove one cause explains the whole business. Keep necessary containment in place while investigating. ASQ's problem-solving guidance separates problem definition, cause verification, implementation and sustained results. The quote example and working record here are an owner-focused illustration.
Common questions
It is the investigation of the conditions producing a business problem, using operating evidence, alternative explanations and tests of a proposed change.
No. A root cause explains why a failure occurs. A constraint limits what the business can achieve now. They can coincide, but may require different changes.
Yes. Different jobs, customers or stages can fail for different reasons. Separate the affected groups before assuming one explanation applies to all of them.
Check whether the change was implemented, whether the suspected cause changed, and whether another condition still limits the result. A failed test is a reason to revise the explanation, not automatically to spend more on the same remedy.
Related pages
Separate the selected problem, solution, provider and implementation before another purchase.
Compare scope, internal ownership, decisions and handoff across successive providers.
Locate the business area that needs closer investigation when the initial complaint is still broad.
Move to priorities when several evidenced problems compete for the same people and attention.
Next step
Ongoing coaching can support decisions, action and review. A defined investigation or implementation project may call for consulting. The scope of the work determines the fit.